Longevity & AgingResearch PaperOpen Access

Women in Otolaryngology Face Widespread Gender Disparities Across Career Domains

Comprehensive review reveals significant inequities in representation, leadership, harassment, and family planning for female ENT surgeons.

Sunday, April 12, 2026 0 views
Published in Laryngoscope
Professional female surgeon in scrubs examining medical charts in a modern hospital setting, with diverse medical team in background

Summary

A comprehensive scoping review of 97 studies reveals pervasive gender disparities affecting women in otolaryngology (ENT surgery). Women remain significantly underrepresented, comprising only 14.5-37% of practicing ENT surgeons despite representing over 50% of medical students. The analysis identified systematic inequities across four key domains: professional representation, scholarship and leadership opportunities, workplace discrimination and harassment, and challenges related to pregnancy and parenthood. These findings highlight the urgent need for institutional and systemic changes to address gender-based barriers in surgical specialties.

Detailed Summary

This landmark scoping review systematically analyzed the experiences of women in otolaryngology (ENT surgery), synthesizing data from 97 studies across multiple countries to reveal widespread gender disparities that persist throughout medical training and practice.

The research team conducted a comprehensive search of five major databases, examining studies that described the experiences of female ENT surgeons and trainees. Their analysis revealed troubling patterns of inequality across four critical domains that affect women's careers and well-being in this surgical specialty.

The most striking finding was the persistent underrepresentation of women in ENT surgery. Despite women comprising 50.5-59% of medical students, they represent only 14.5-37% of practicing ENT surgeons globally. This disparity extends beyond numbers to encompass leadership roles, research productivity, and academic advancement opportunities, where women consistently lag behind their male counterparts.

Perhaps most concerning were the findings related to workplace culture. Women ENT surgeons and trainees reported significantly higher rates of discrimination and harassment compared to men, creating hostile work environments that may contribute to the specialty's retention problems. These experiences were documented across multiple countries and practice settings.

The review also highlighted unique challenges related to pregnancy and parenthood. Women described substantial difficulties with family planning, pregnancy accommodations, and breastfeeding support. Many reported that pregnancy and child-rearing were viewed as barriers to career advancement, forcing difficult choices between professional growth and family life.

These findings have profound implications for the future of ENT surgery and patient care. Previous research suggests that patients treated by female surgeons may have better outcomes, making the underrepresentation of women a potential patient safety issue. The documented disparities also represent a significant waste of human talent and expertise in a critical medical specialty.

Key Findings

  • Women comprise only 14.5-37% of practicing ENT surgeons despite being 50%+ of medical students
  • Female ENT surgeons report significantly higher rates of workplace discrimination and harassment
  • Women face substantial barriers in research productivity and leadership advancement
  • Pregnancy and parenthood create major career obstacles with inadequate institutional support
  • Gender disparities persist across multiple countries and practice settings

Methodology

Scoping review of 97 studies from five major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINAHL) covering experiences of female ENT surgeons and trainees. Used Thomas & Harden framework for thematic analysis with quality assessment via Joanna Briggs Institute tools.

Study Limitations

Most studies were cross-sectional and observational, limiting causal inferences. Geographic bias toward North American studies may limit global generalizability. Quality assessment found only moderate-quality evidence across included studies.

Enjoyed this summary?

Get the latest longevity research delivered to your inbox every week.